找回密码
 点击注册
搜索
查看: 4207|回复: 1

英美学者:武汉10日后逾19万人感染新冠肺炎!

[复制链接]
发表于 2020-1-25 15:57:47 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

英美学者推算 武汉10日后逾19万人感染新冠肺炎?


  据悉,随着新型病毒肺炎感染人数持续上升,有英国和美国的学者推算,如果防疫措施不变,在10日后武汉的感染人数,会增至超过19万,并估计现时武汉实际感染个案中,只有5.1%已被发现,相信因为大部分个案都是病情轻微。【英文报道原文 https://www.wired.com/story/scie ... ill-get-much-worse/

  据香港电台报道,5名来自英国兰开斯特大学等大学的学者,利用截至星期二的个案数据分析,相信武汉市限制进出的措施,只能令武汉以外的传染个案减少约25%,相信对于阻止国内传播效用不大,并推算上海、北京、广州、重庆和成都会出现爆发,而泰国、日本、台湾、香港和南韩亦有机会因为空中交通而有输入个案。

  学者估计感染新型冠状病毒的病人,平均可以将病毒传染给3.8人,比沙士多,认为个案快速增加的程度,远比沙士或中东呼吸综合症高,估计控制疫情会更加困难。


回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2020-1-25 15:59:40 | 显示全部楼层

SCIENCE01.24.2020 07:29 PM

Scientists Predict Wuhan's Outbreak Will Get Much Worse


New estimates of how far the virus could spread suggest an explosion of cases will hit the Chinese city and more infected individuals will show up abroad.

people in face masks

people in face masks

people in face masks

PHOTOGRAPH: KEVIN FRAYER/GETTY IMAGES

As more data on the new coronavirus circulating in China emerges, it’s becoming clear that whatever the country is experiencing now—dozens of deaths, hundreds of people hospitalized, cities of millions quarantined—is just the tip of the outbreak.

On Friday, a team of researchers based in the UK and US reported in a preliminary paper that the number of confirmed cases at the outbreak’s epicenter in Wuhan reflects only 5 percent of people who are actually infected. That would mean that for Tuesday, the last day they included in their analysis, the real number of cases is not 440, as has been reported, but is more like 12,000. The paper, which has not yet undergone peer review, appeared on the Medrxiv preprint server. Already, since Tuesday, the number of diagnosed coronavirus patients in Wuhan has shot up to 729.

Using case data scraped from official reports, a team led by Jonathan Read at Lancaster University plotted a temporal map of the coronavirus’s spread, starting on January 1, when local authorities closed the meat-and-animal market where the virus is believed to have crossed into humans from an unknown source. They worked under the assumption that any spread following the first of the year could only be between humans.

The models they constructed predict a dire start to February: further outbreaks in other Chinese cities, more infections exported abroad, and an explosion of cases in Wuhan. “In 14 days’ time, our model predicts the number of infected people in Wuhan to be greater than 190,000,” the authors write.

“I can buy it,” says Brandon Brown, an epidemiologist at UC Riverside who was not involved in the study. Especially given that people can carry the virus without showing symptoms, according to another study, published Friday by a team of Chinese researchers in The Lancet. In a first look at clinical data from the initial 41 patients admitted to hospitals in Wuhan, the scientists reported that 2019-nCoV, as the virus is currently called, causes a range of symptoms, including pneumonia, fever, and cough, and can strike even healthy people, not just older individuals with underlying health issues. They believe the virus’s incubation period to be between three and six days.

Taken together, the studies suggest large numbers of people could be walking around for days with no symptoms, spreading the virus to anyone who comes in close contact. Add to that a rapidly fatiguing health care workforce, the lack of a World Health Organization emergency declaration, and Lunar New Year travel, and the Lancaster group’s numbers seem plausible, says Brown. “Right now there is plenty of uncertainty on what will happen, but models may be our best method to predict how the epidemic will progress in the near future.”

One big uncertainty: how infectious is 2019-nCoV, really? Read’s models estimate that the number of people one victim can infect—known as the virus’s reproduction number—is between 3.6 and 4.0. SARS, by comparison, was between a 2 and a 5, and measles, the most contagious disease known to humans, is a whopping 12 to 18. The higher the number, the less wiggle room public health officials have to break the chain of new transmissions before an outbreak gets out of control. Anything above 1 is bad from a containment perspective.

Other recent estimates for 2019-nCoV are more conservative than Read’s, however. Yesterday, Harvard researchers Maimuna Majumder and Kenneth Mandl reported a preliminary assessment of the virus’s transmissibility as ranging from 2.0 to 3.3. WHO officials said on Thursday the best estimate they’ve seen is somewhere between 1.4 and 2.5.

All of which means that containing this thing is starting to look a lot more difficult than it did a few weeks ago. On Thursday, the WHO also reported for the first time that the coronavirus has undergone at least four generations of spread. That means that one person caught it from someone else, who caught it from yet another human, who was infected by a fourth individual, who contracted it from a nonhuman source. The announcement contradicts earlier reports that transmission was limited to family members and health care workers who’d been in close contact, and supports the notion that the virus is already circulating much more widely than confirmed cases indicate.

Read and his coauthors acknowledge that at this point all predictions are shaky, given the limited information available. But with an outbreak that’s moving as fast as this one, models like theirs are often the best tools available for public health officials to decide how to combat what’s coming next.

回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 点击注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|SiXiang.com 思乡思想

GMT+8, 2024-4-16 16:11

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表